Advertise Here!
 

Most Viewed

Top 6 articles this week:

Write In

In order to use this feature, please sign in or register.

Current Articles | Categories | Search | Syndication

Don't blame Wall Street fat cats

John McCain insists that the present financial crisis is the direct result of Wall Street's "unbridled corruption and greed." Sarah Palin says likewise...


By Jonah Goldberg

John McCain insists that the present financial crisis is the direct result of Wall Street's "unbridled corruption and greed." Sarah Palin says likewise. Senator Obama, for the most part, has merely echoed what Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson has already said. Obama has an excuse, though: He hasn't finished conducting his seminar on what's going on; he'll get back to us after a rousing multivariate analysis of the value of "decisiveness." Joe Biden says the Wall Street crisis is the result of George W. Bush's tax cuts, which makes as much sense as blaming the rising price of fairy dust. But as a wise man once asked, Who gives a rat's patoot what Joe Biden thinks?

Nonetheless, blame is settling on those old standby scapegoats, Wall Street fat cats.

So, who should go to jail? And the answer, as far as I can tell, is: no one—at least no one on Wall Street. The starting line for the parade of falling dominoes doesn't begin on Wall Street. Nor, alas, will the parade end there. But if you want to know where it really begins, look to the Capitol steps.
T
he self-proclaimed angels in Washington will tell you they've been working tirelessly to expand the American dream of homeownership by making mortgages available to people unable to plunk down 20 percent on a house. Franklin Raines, the Clinton-appointed former head of Fannie Mae from 1998 to 2004, made it his top priority to make mortgages easier to get for people with poor credit, few assets and little money for a down payment.

The Clinton administration, meanwhile, reinterpreted the Jimmy Carter-era Community Reinvestment Act to politicize lending practices. Under the CRA, the government forced banks to prove they weren't “redlining”—i.e., discriminating against minorities—by  approving loans to minorities and various left-wing "community group" shakedown artists whether they were bad risks or not. (A young Barack Obama got his start with exactly these sorts of groups.) Sen. Phil Gramm called it a vast extortion scheme against America's banks. Still, the banks were perfectly happy to pass the risky loans to Raines' Fannie Mae, which was happy to buy them up.

That's because Raines was transforming Fannie Mae into a risky venture that abused its special status as a "Government Sponsored Enterprise" (GSE) for Raines' personal profit. Fannie bought the bad loans and bundled them together with good ones. Wall Street was glad to buy up these mortgage securities because Fannie Mae was deemed a government-insured behemoth "too big to fail." And others followed Fannie's lead.

The current financial crisis stems in large part from the fact that people who shouldn't have been buying a home, or who bought more home than they could afford, now can't pay their bills. Their bad mortgages are mixed up with the good mortgages. And thanks in part to new accounting rules set up after Enron, the bad mortgages have contaminated the whole pile, reducing the value of even stable mortgages.

In 2003, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac revealed they cooked their books to overstate their earnings and that they didn't really know what was going on. The Bush administration pushed for reforms, but those efforts were rebuffed by Congress, with Democrats Barney Frank and Christopher Dodd taking point, because Fannie and Freddie have spent millions in campaign contributions.

In 2005, McCain sponsored legislation to thwart what he later called "the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the housing market, the overall financial system and the economy as a whole."

Obama, the Senate's second-greatest recipient of donations from Fannie and Freddie after Dodd, did nothing.

Meanwhile, Raines, the head of a government-supported institution, made $52 million of his $90 million compensation package, thanks in part to fraudulent earnings statements.

But, ah yes, the greedy criminals responsible for this mess must be somewhere on Wall Street.

News Editor Stephanie Ramage donated her column space to Jonah Goldberg this week.

COMMENTS

Commentby Harris | Sunday, September 21, 2008, 8:32 AM

Fannie and Freddie don't loan money, they buy back loans. If the Banks, Mortgage Houses and Inspectors in the field were corrupt, Fannie and Freddie aren't to blame. They were empowered to take these loans on good faith to keep the "Littler Guys" lending.

As usual, Washington and the pundits are ego-centric and myopic to the point of misleading the public.

Washington blames Wall Street, Wall Street blames Washington, and pundits like Goldberg try to label members of the political party they dislike as the culprits, while selling us the idea that Republicans, of all people, were always in favor of super-regulating the business.

Sound fishy? That's because Republicans have, until this election cycle, trumpeted de-regulation or total non-regulation of business as their highest political virtue.

Truth is - small town America was bought out by Banks and Brokers and sold to Fannie and Freddie in "good faith" that was really nothing more than dishonest greed mongering.

And while it may have been Corporate American Banks funneling the funds, it always comes down to the Home Inspectors and the actual loan agents, the truly Little Guys, going through each property and writing up reports saying "Yes, this property IS worth X Amount."

If those appraisals had been accurate, rather than rushed through with a wink and a nod to secure loans for the flip to Fannie and Freddie, the Housing Market would be stable today, instead of suddenly "correcting" its value by 25%.

Finally, it just rings a little hollow when John "Keating Five" McCain and Bush tell us all how they just needed to regulate the mortgage industry but some other politicians wouldn't let them do it.

Since when did Bush/Cheney get pushed around by anyone on any issue?  

You must be logged in to post a comment. You can log in here.

The Sunday Paper actively moderates site content.
Offensive material will be removed.
However, user comments on display do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Sunday Paper or its staff.

Get what we're talking about
Items we've reviewed in the latest issues of The Sunday Paper, from Amazon.com

 
Advertisement
Depression Studdy
Advertisement
Sharp Residential Banner Block
Advertisement
Skyscraper